Boutique Firm vs. Mainstream Firm

Sean Perkin and his team of talented artisans at Sean Perkin & Associates have been acquiring apartment buildings and single family homes throughout Southern California since 2008. He encourages readers to visit his tumblr to learn more about his company and the services they provide. The success of Sean Perkin & Associates is no doubt partial to their boutique style firm, which is simply one that operates within a niche. According to an article on Consulting Career Connection, it is important to consider the long-term potential, scope, framework, and culture of big firms versus specialized boutiques.

Long-term potential

Boutique firms deliver a small number of high quality services and focus on specific challenges across fewer industries. This promises more focus to the clients. Due to their size and abilities, larger firms are able to focus on a variety of function across a number of industries. Essentially, you need to decide what direction your company is heading and which option is best for you in the long run.

Scope

Both types of firms require the ability to work well with a team and clients. At Mainstream firms, clients are able to choose their team members based on their expertise and experience. On the other hand, boutique firms can only provide smaller teams; a benefit when it comes to client exposure.

Framework

Larger firms have well developed resources, infrastructure, and information systems, which many argue ease stress. Contrary, it can be said that this bureaucracy can stifle the creativity that comes from smaller firms, which must be more clever and resourceful to provide low-cost solutions.

Culture

A major difference between boutique and mainstream firms is the culture. Clients of mainstream firms will have to meet with hundreds of people daily, making it feel less personal. Smaller firms offer a more familial approach, fostering deep rooted relationships.

Speak Your Mind

*